Help with 2213/A

Started by MIRCS, 09-25-2006 -- 09:27:15

Previous topic - Next topic

MIRCS

Well isn't this just a day that seems to be going to hell in a handbasket on equipment.

I have 2...I repeat 2 2213 and 2213A that have gone mammaries up on the first test.

I am using Navair 17-20AW-218..........I just printed 33K3-4-1072-1, which I believe will let the unit pass, but I'm just not that kinda of person.

I need a manual for the 2213, does anybody have an electronic copy of the manual? If so please send me an email at ndale_at_yulista_dot_com

If you can make scans and send me the adjustments section at the same address.

If I only had some fresh sheep, I know Coup would come through for me.

flew-da-coup

I have the 2213 operators manual in a PDF. give me a little time and I will see if I have the service man.
You shall do no injustice in judgment, in measurement of length, weight, or volume.Leviticus 19:35

flew-da-coup

I want 10 good sheep that have not ever been shaved before. Then you get what you need. :evil:
You shall do no injustice in judgment, in measurement of length, weight, or volume.Leviticus 19:35

LarryH

What do you mean it will pass the Navair but not the K-proc?  As far as I remember, the main differences between them is the Navy does risetime and overshoot/undershoot while the Air Force does bandwidth.  THe risetime and overshoot/undershoot alignment is generally all of the vertical amplifier steps with a resistor and capacitor next to the IC amp chip.  Tweaking these in order over and over will square up the leading edge.  You can tell which amp affects which portion of the square wave as you tweak them. 
Note to Air Force techs:  If you have never tweaked the edge squareness (HF comp) on a scope is a definite must learn process.  You will be amazed at how bad some of those Air Force scopes are with overshoot and bad risetime.   Next time you SWEEP a scope during bandwidth, carefully watch if it blooms and dips constantly when nearing the bandwidth limit.  If it is pretty bad, apply a high freq sqaure wave and check out the risetime and over/under shoot.   Align it according to the T.O. and check it again.  When you see the improvement, you won't let another scope go by in that condition again.
USAF PMEL: 82-91, Civie PMEL: 91-05,  post PMEL 05 and on.

MIRCS

Quote from: LarryH on 10-05-2006 -- 21:58:56
What do you mean it will pass the Navair but not the K-proc?  As far as I remember, the main differences between them is the Navy does risetime and overshoot/undershoot while the Air Force does bandwidth.  THe risetime and overshoot/undershoot alignment is generally all of the vertical amplifier steps with a resistor and capacitor next to the IC amp chip.  Tweaking these in order over and over will square up the leading edge.  You can tell which amp affects which portion of the square wave as you tweak them. 
Note to Air Force techs:  If you have never tweaked the edge squareness (HF comp) on a scope is a definite must learn process.  You will be amazed at how bad some of those Air Force scopes are with overshoot and bad risetime.   Next time you SWEEP a scope during bandwidth, carefully watch if it blooms and dips constantly when nearing the bandwidth limit.  If it is pretty bad, apply a high freq sqaure wave and check out the risetime and over/under shoot.   Align it according to the T.O. and check it again.  When you see the improvement, you won't let another scope go by in that condition again.

No the scope would pass the Kpro, not the NAVAIR. The Kpro was from the 80's and 2 pages long. barely checke anything.

Water under the bridge, the documentation Coup sent fixed the problem. No longer an issue.

Thanks about the info on adjusting edge squarness.