PMEL Forum

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Conman on 07-14-2008 -- 04:00:57

Title: Warner Robbins
Post by: Conman on 07-14-2008 -- 04:00:57
I read recently that the Warner Robbins contract was up for bids.  Did the contract holder change or is it still KAI?
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: USMCPMEL on 07-14-2008 -- 08:33:20
Where is Warner Robbins at?
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: chinman on 07-14-2008 -- 18:46:59
South of Macon Georgia!
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: USMCPMEL on 07-15-2008 -- 08:18:20
HMM well thanks for the info. Never been to georgia did not know.
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: ventura on 09-24-2008 -- 17:41:03
Dang that sucks I always liked that lab.
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: mysterymeat on 11-14-2008 -- 22:03:58
Bid submission date has been changed to indefinite, and the union was voted in today.
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: Broken_Wings on 11-15-2008 -- 05:49:11
Curious about an indefinite date and the rfp being archived already on FBO I went to FBO. Apparently the indefinite date has to do with one of the clauses regarding input variation.

Attachment modified to remove .af.mil e-mail address to prevent spam. Original document available at a link I provided before (fbo.gov)
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: mdbuike on 11-17-2008 -- 22:57:30
I think some of the input problem is the engineers at AFMETCAL are using the action taken's inputed through PAMS to set the calibration interval..

Blue suiters ( to my experience ) tend to use "J" unless they order a part or are "caught" adusting something..especially if they actually have a management that insists on out of tolerance letters..

As a contractor, I don't mind showing how my day goes..If it takes me 4 hours to align something, then the Gov't should know why it took that long..especially if it's because the customer broke the seal on the item (I was doing some inflator kits last week, and all of them from one workcenter had the torque seal broken, and all were out of tolerance.)

This just goes to show how action takens should be honest, not just to get out of some paperwork.

Mike
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: PMEL_DEVIL-DOG on 01-13-2009 -- 12:22:56
So what was the outcome? :?
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: Broken_Wings on 02-05-2009 -- 14:40:17
If Robins gets the dreaded shaft of the wage determination will quality also be considered Metrology Technicians or classified as something else making them the spots people crave? (also the only people that are likely to stay)
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: jimmyc on 02-10-2009 -- 17:17:25
how did the vote go?
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: CalibratorJ on 02-12-2009 -- 21:09:39
Quote from: InLikeFlynn on 07-16-2008 -- 21:01:49
rumored to go down-area wage determination and the Georgia Dept of Labor did us no favors with the addition of Metrology Tech-they did a horrible job of grotesquely misrepresenting our career field

Yeah, Huntsville, AL took a huge hit due to the "Metrology Tech" change as well......... talk about a chunk outta the paycheck!
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: MIRCS on 02-15-2009 -- 17:36:57
That's the thing........the military doesn't compete with the civilian sector.  I only make 22 and some change an hour right now but there are nice raises coming in the following years............though still concerned since we transitioned to NSPS this year. 

We were making about $16/hour when Bionetics took over the contract at Moody.  Then when Yulista got the contract we making about $19/hour.  When they accepted the CBA it went to about $22/hour.  We were really screwed on the wage determination. 

At the Naval Surface Warfare Center Dalhgren they changed over to Metrology Technician when Allutiq took the contract from Yulista and it was a pay reduction for new hires, they let people who were there stay at their rates.

But above all we military labs will never compete with the civilian sector unless we start doing their work which I don't see ever happening.
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: CalibratorJ on 02-16-2009 -- 07:07:31
Quote from: MIRCS on 02-15-2009 -- 17:36:57
But above all we military labs will never compete with the civilian sector unless we start doing their work which I don't see ever happening.

Some military (DOD) labs DO compete with the civilian sector labs. I will not go into specifics, but the lab I am at does a LOT of reimbursable work for several different companies.....
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: Thraxas on 02-23-2009 -- 20:12:18
They probably won't choose a contractor until after the audit...which is about two and a half weeks away. Joy! Oh joy! :roll:
Title: Re: Warner Robbins
Post by: Guppy on 07-17-2009 -- 21:30:15
So did the contract change at WR?  Who has the contract?  What union did you go with?  Did it increase your pay?  And lasty is Wino still there?  Last I heard he was QA