Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
01-24-2021 -- 12:12:11

Login with username, password and session length

Top 10 Posters

flew-da-coup (1303)
Hawaii596 (1015)
griff61 (580)
Hoopty (548)
docbyers (544)
MIRCS (535)
CalLabSolutions (523)
Thraxas (498)
  • Total Posts: 19265
  • Total Topics: 3662
  • Online Today: 30
  • Online Ever: 242
  • (04-19-2014 -- 19:20:34)
Users Online
Users: 1
Guests: 15
Total: 16

Author Topic: PAMS 6 Rumours  (Read 5827 times)

Offline Old-Navy

  • 5-level
  • ***
  • Posts: 362
  • Action Taken: +16/-2
PAMS 6 Rumours
« on: 08-12-2004 -- 16:34:33 »
Got this one in my e mail today....  not sure of the validity... but I wouldn't doubt it..  *smirk* :twisted:

"Hey did you hear they stopped the PAMS conversion for everybody now.  They aren’t gonna let any other bases convert until they fix all the problems we’re having.  They are now referring to the bases that have the new PAMS as the 'Unlucky 6' or something like that."

Dammit Jim, I'm a Metrologist.... not a .......
<~Precision Bombing Begins With Precision Measurement~>                        The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing ~~~~ Socrates               

Offline MIRCS

  • 7-level
  • ****
  • Posts: 535
  • Action Taken: +9/-3
    • Email
PAMS 6 Rumours
« Reply #1 on: 08-12-2004 -- 19:03:02 »
Intresting....very, very intresting

Offline Erdwurm

  • Pinger
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Action Taken: +0/-0
    • http://
PAMS 6 Rumours
« Reply #2 on: 08-15-2004 -- 19:46:35 »
I can't find the email here at home (probably put in my PST) but I received an email saying they were halting the uploading of other bases until they fix some problems they are having right now.

We uploaded PAMS 6.0 into our system here at Aviano last week. We've only been using it for 2 days now, and it isn't too bad so far. The lag problems aren't too bad for us since we are using it when all you stateside people are sleeping, starts to bog down about 3pm or so our time when you all wake up.

There have been minor complaints about some things that aren't implemented, but thats mostly report wise. We will probably make the reports with Oracle. Overall, its not too bad, it'll have its growing pains, but thats to be expected.

I worked for about 6 months trying to get our micron's upgraded, and finally got my wish, we got brand new dell's to replace every single one of those damnedable pos Micron's about a month ago. Got top of the line stuff even! <flex>
Richard "Lee" Wynn
PMEL Journeyman and Workgroup Manager
Aviano AB, Italy

Offline MikeyB

  • Pinger
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Action Taken: +0/-0
PAMS 6 Rumours
« Reply #3 on: 08-16-2004 -- 04:34:21 »
Here at Travis we just started using the PAMS 6.  Doesnt seem to bad so far but we have been told that they loaded 10 out of 90 bases or so and halted loading any others cause the lag is so bad when loading people into the system.


DISCLAIMER:  This site is not an official US Air Force site, it is intended for private use only.  It is not endorsed, in any way, by the US Air Force, the DoD, or any other governmental agency.  Additionally, all information found within this site is just that, it is NOT meant to be used in place of authorized publications.

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.

All forum content is the property of the respective poster, all the rest © 2004-2017 by PMEL Forum.