Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
09-18-2019 -- 02:54:42

Login with username, password and session length

Top 10 Posters

flew-da-coup (1303)
Hawaii596 (1015)
USMCPMEL (845)
griff61 (573)
Hoopty (548)
docbyers (544)
MIRCS (535)
CalLabSolutions (517)
PMEL_DEVIL-DOG (509)
Thraxas (498)
Members
  • Total Members: 3610
  • Latest: wilders
Stats
  • Total Posts: 19139
  • Total Topics: 3584
  • Online Today: 64
  • Online Ever: 242
  • (04-19-2014 -- 19:20:34)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 42
Total: 42


Author Topic: Accelerometer Uncertainty  (Read 461 times)

Offline briansalomon

  • 5-level
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
  • Action Taken: +4/-1
    • Email
Accelerometer Uncertainty
« on: 07-01-2019 -- 20:43:18 »
I'm getting uncertainties for my accelerometer calibrations that are higher than anyone else I am seeing published.

My numbers are based on a Dytran 3120B (reference accelerometer) and a VR 9500 controller.

For simplicity's sake the reference acceleometer is +/- 2% rdg and the controller is +/- 2% rdg (approximate numbers)

I'm using uniform distribution with K=2

With repeatability and temperature coefficient factored in I am getting an RSS uncertainty of:

5 Hz - 10 Hz = 8.48% rdg
10 Hz - 2 Khz = 6.10% rdg
2 Khz - 8 Khz = 7.41% rdg
8 Khz - 10 Khz = 8.02% rdg

My system is comparing the accel under test to my reference accel establishing the sensitivity and then comparing the frequency response of the accel under test to my reference accel.

I'm wondering if there is something obvious I am missing that explains why my numbers are so much higher than anyone else....


Bring technical excellence with you when you walk in the door every day.

Offline silv3rstr3

  • 5-level
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Action Taken: +6/-2
  • USMC (6492) Precision Measurement Equipment Chief
    • Email
Re: Accelerometer Uncertainty
« Reply #1 on: 07-03-2019 -- 14:38:21 »
They do seem unusually high.  I haven't utilized a vibration standard since the military.  They do blow up C-4 in one of our manufacturing plants here testing satellite payloads disembarking from rockets.  Most hardcore accelerometers and analysis system I've ever seen! 

These are the average uncertainties I found for most companies.  Most don't list the actual accelerometer standard used...

Acceleration - (0.01 - 10g)
(7 < 10Hz) - 4% Reading
(10 < 30Hz) - 3% Reading
(30 < 2000Hz) - 1.5% Reading
(2 to 10kHz) - 4% Reading
“They are in front of us, behind us, and we are flanked on both sides by an enemy that out numbers us 29:1. They can’t get away from us now!!”
-Chesty Puller

Offline briansalomon

  • 5-level
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
  • Action Taken: +4/-1
    • Email
Re: Accelerometer Uncertainty
« Reply #2 on: 07-08-2019 -- 21:02:12 »
That's what I'm seeing for the average provider.

I think what is happening is the controller error is being eliminated as a contributor (If you had all the data I suppose a rationale could be made for that) and is left out of the calculation.
Bring technical excellence with you when you walk in the door every day.

 

DISCLAIMER:  This site is not an official US Air Force site, it is intended for private use only.  It is not endorsed, in any way, by the US Air Force, the DoD, or any other governmental agency.  Additionally, all information found within this site is just that, it is NOT meant to be used in place of authorized publications.


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.

All forum content is the property of the respective poster, all the rest © 2004-2017 by PMEL Forum.