PMEL Forum
Forum
»
Non-Equipment Areas
»
Quality Assurance
»
extension requirements
Username:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Password:
Home
Forum
Help
Search
Quick Search
Advanced Search
[Close]
Calendar
Login
Register
Main Menu
AF Fitness Calculator
Bookmarks
Downloads
Forum
Guestbook
Job Listings
Metrology Handbook
T.O. 00-20-14
2P0X1 CDC Tester
User
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
09-09-2010 -- 00:09:39
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Top 10 Posters
flew-da-coup
(1250)
docbyers
(543)
PMEL_DEVIL-DOG
(508)
MIRCS
(503)
Thraxas
(498)
Hoopty
(490)
Old-Navy
(349)
bradley563
(276)
Hawaii596
(250)
USMCPMEL
(241)
Stats
Members
Total Members: 1931
Latest:
macad
Stats
Total Posts: 10315
Total Topics: 1403
Online Today: 23
Online Ever: 171
(11-14-2009 -- 12:46:07)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 15
Spiders: 2
Total: 17
Online Today
Total: 0
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: extension requirements (Read 282 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
CALSQUID81
Pinger
Action Taken:
+0/-0
Offline
Posts: 24
extension requirements
«
on:
07-29-2010 -- 13:04:59 »
I'm looking for a guideline (Z540, ISO 17025 etc.) that says whether or not you may extend the calibration of a standard after it has gone past its due date, and if so how long.
Logged
"Badges? We don't need no stinking badges!!!"
RFCAL
3-level
Action Taken:
+3/-0
Offline
Posts: 66
Re: extension requirements
«
Reply #1 on:
07-29-2010 -- 21:43:55 »
that is up to your quality manual
Logged
beadwork
Pinger
Action Taken:
+0/-0
Offline
Posts: 18
Re: extension requirements
«
Reply #2 on:
07-30-2010 -- 06:43:33 »
You might want to do this only if you have enough objective historical evidence about the stability/accuracy of the standard. This is used to support the decision to take the risk that extending the cal interval will result in an in-tolerance condition when the standard is re-calibrated.
Extending cal intervals is all about risk management. What would be the ramifications if the standard was found to be out of tolerance at its next re-calibration?
«
Last Edit: 07-30-2010 -- 06:45:42 by beadwork
»
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General
-----------------------------
=> News
=> General Discussion
=> Polls
-----------------------------
K Sections
-----------------------------
=> K1/8 - DC/Low Frequency
=> K3/4 - Waveform Analysis & RF Generation
===> Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN)
=> K5/6 - Physical Dimensional
=> Test Sets
=> Automated Calibrations
-----------------------------
Non-Equipment Areas
-----------------------------
=> Additional Duties
===> Technical Orders and AFTO Form 22 Info
===> Training & CDC's
=> PAMS and PAMS 6
=> Production Control
=> Quality Assurance
-----------------------------
Miscellaneous
-----------------------------
=> Jobs Forum
=> Ways You Can Support PMEL Forum
=> Suggestions
=> Test Forum
=> Bugs and Problems
September Birthdays
Aprosule
(Sep 02)
ken91379
(Sep 13)
scotte1069
(Sep 15)
ventura
(Sep 15)
mwpridgen
(Sep 16)
damu1972
(Sep 27)
Fitz
(Sep 28)
astromatt
(Sep 28)
docbyers
(Sep 30)
Loading...